Column 2: evidence · does the wage follow the cost
index
Open data, followed all the way down to one person inside it.
Every piece here starts with a public dataset and ends with a story. The numbers can be checked: any figure set in mono opens its own evidence in a column to the right, so you never have to leave the sentence you are reading to find out whether it is true.
open to work
03pieces
271occupations
4,810teenagers
34provinces
work
files
evidence · does the wage follow the cost
Both variables in logs, so the coefficient reads as an elasticity: the percentage the minimum wage moves for each percent the poverty line moves. 238 province-years, 34 provinces, 7 years.
specification
β
se
se, clustered
t
95% CI
province fixed effects
+1.146
0.034
0.042
+27.1
[+1.063, +1.228]
province + year fixed effects
−0.262
0.206
0.218
−1.2
[−0.689, +0.164]
Adding the year effect is the whole result. It removes what happened to the entire country at once, and with it the entire apparent relationship.
the same question asked across provinces instead of within them
year
n
r
ρ
elasticity
r²
2015
34
+0.557
+0.510
+0.646
23.4%
2016
34
+0.471
+0.354
+0.568
16.6%
2017
34
+0.522
+0.426
+0.528
22.7%
2018
34
+0.531
+0.452
+0.519
22.9%
2019
34
+0.542
+0.465
+0.515
24.2%
2020
34
+0.517
+0.416
+0.497
21.9%
2022
34
+0.496
+0.412
+0.493
21.1%
In any single year, cost of living accounts for a median 22.7% of why provincial minimum wages differ. The other ~77% is something else — bargaining, politics, precedent, the previous year’s number plus a formula.